Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

COVID-19 Locating At-Risk Populations

Not sure when to seek testing or medical care? Or do you suspect you or someone you know has contracted COVID-19 or has come into close contact with someone who has COVID-19? Take the CDC's Coronavirus Self-Checker below:
 

View Our Indicators

Click on an indicator to find a map by city/census place, zip, and/or census tract.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

COVID-19 Indicators

COVID-19 Indicators

COVID-19 Indicators

COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

COVID-19 Indicators

COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate County: Lake

Current Value:

COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate County: Lake

3.92
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 3.92 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.99 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.75.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 3.92 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (6.23), Lake has a value of 3.92 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.23)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Lake has a value of 3.92 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (3.92) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.16).
Prior Value
(5.16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COVID-19 Indicators

COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Value
Compared to:

COVID-19 Indicators

COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Value
Compared to:

COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate County: Lake

Current Value:

COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate County: Lake

0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.3.
CA Counties
(Feb 3, 2023)
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.0), Lake has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Lake has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Vulnerable Populations

Vulnerable Populations

Vulnerable Populations

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes County: Lake

8.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Lake has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Lake has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Lake (8.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.7%).
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Lake

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Lake

16.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 16.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (23.6), Lake has a value of 16.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Lake has a value of 16.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (16.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.1).
Prior Value
(15.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Vulnerable Populations

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Lake

19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.0%), Lake has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Lake has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (19.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations

Adults with Disability

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Adults with Disability

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Disability County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults with Disability County: Lake

49.1%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.7%), Lake has a value of 49.1%.
CA Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (20.6%), Lake has a value of 49.1%.
US Value
(20.6% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Lake (49.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.4%).
Prior Value
(53.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations

Persons with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Persons with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Persons with a Disability County: Lake

Current Value:

Persons with a Disability County: Lake

19.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 19.8%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Lake has a value of 19.8%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Lake

31.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 31.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 31.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Lake has a value of 31.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lake has a value of 31.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Vulnerable Populations

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Lake

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.0%), Lake has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Lake has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Lake

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Lake

10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 10.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 10.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Lake has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Lake has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Lake

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Lake

21.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 21.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 21.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Lake has a value of 21.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Lake has a value of 21.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Lake

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Lake

2,082
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Vulnerable Populations

Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Value
Compared to:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Lake

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Lake

42.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Lake has a value of 42.9%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Lake has a value of 42.9%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Vulnerable Populations

Total Homeless Population

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Total Homeless Population

Value
Compared to:

Total Homeless Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Total Homeless Population County: Lake

460
Persons
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Lake (460) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (339).
Prior Value
(339)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations

Unsheltered Homeless

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Unsheltered Homeless

Value
Compared to:

Unsheltered Homeless County: Lake

Current Value:

Unsheltered Homeless County: Lake

259
Persons
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Lake (259) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (259).
Prior Value
(259)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations

Sheltered Homeless

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations

Sheltered Homeless

Value
Compared to:

Sheltered Homeless County: Lake

Current Value:

Sheltered Homeless County: Lake

201
Persons
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Lake (201) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (80).
Prior Value
(80)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Population Over Age 65 (Count) County: Lake

Current Value:

Population Over Age 65 (Count) County: Lake

15,801
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Vulnerable Populations 65+

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Lake

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Lake

4,442
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Vulnerable Populations 65+

People 65+ Living Alone

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

People 65+ Living Alone

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone County: Lake

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone County: Lake

28.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 28.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 28.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Lake has a value of 28.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Lake has a value of 28.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Vulnerable Populations 65+

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Lake

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Lake

1,571
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations 65+

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Lake

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Lake

10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Lake has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Lake

18.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Lake has a value of 18.8%.
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Lake has a value of 18.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Lake

11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Lake has a value of 11.4%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Lake has a value of 11.4%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Lake

7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Lake has a value of 7.8%.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Lake has a value of 7.8%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Lake

15.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Lake has a value of 15.9%.
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Lake has a value of 15.9%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Vulnerable Populations 65+

Adults 65+ with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Lake

39.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Lake has a value of 39.8%.
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Lake has a value of 39.8%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV